In school, we learn that voting is a way of settling disagreements and reaching consensus. However, the way in which we vote has its limitations, and that’s where Concordamos comes in.
In a regular election, say, to choose a new mayor, the candidate with the most votes wins. But what if wanted to rank our choices or elect more than one candidate? That’s where Concordamos comes in.
Concordamos is a tool for groups that need to define priorities and reach a consensus. Always open and free, this tool brings the “quadratic voting” methodology to the digital world. What results is a voting process that is more representative of the group, especially of its varieties of preference.
In practice, what can we settle with Concordamos?
If you need to collectively rank ideas or proposals, use Concordamos.
If you need to find common ground among different ideas, use Concordamos.
If you need to settle contests, be it in small groups, apartment buildings or even prime-time reality shows, use Concordamos.
The name “Concordamos” is meant to reflect the desire people have of finding something on which many can agree, of ending a discussion with a satisfying decision that will please everyone.
Concordamos adopts the quadratic voting methodology, tested and verified in several countries, and covered by many international news stories.
In a regular poll, everyone gets one vote, and whoever receives the most vote wins. This method is great, but it has its limitations.
With Concordamos, everyone gets the same number of votes, but each person can choose to allocate more votes to prioritize whatever they wish.
The result of this method has been tested and approved: by the end of the vote, the group finds out which proposals best represent the group’s priorities.
